Freestyle Collective has updated their site and their work (at least I’m pretty sure this qualifies as an update). Amazing stuff, of course.
Ponder their goodness.

Looking at their reel, I can’t help but feel that it contains every single mograph trend that’s hot today (and a couple that were hot yesterday). From 3D graffiti to silhouetted flora to hand-drawn figures to retro rainbows, it’s all there.
I’m new to the mograph scene, but like web design (from whither I came), the appeal of substance-less style is undeniable. At first. And then, once the trends become readily identifiable and the Who’s Who becomes as familiar as your old Rolodex of high-school buddies, the appeal begins to fade.
Mograph is no different than any other design medium: It needs substance in order to truly stand the test of time.
Just as I finished typing the previous sentence, I started to doubt it. I mean, I’m not 100% convinced that design does need substance or that it needs to “stand the test of time.” Sure, if you want to win the respect of well-respected designers and sundry other aesthetes, then I suppose it matters. But what if, as Justin Harder says, you just want to make cool shit?
I’m also not convinced that substance and style are truly separable concepts. It’s an easy dichotomy to buy without really thinking about it, but can’t style sometimes function as substance? Isn’t that what MTV and Diesel have built their empires on? Style is the substance they peddle, it’s the cultural commodity they trade, no?
Okay, I’m obviously baiting you now. My apologies to Freestyle for using them as a springboard for what is sure to go down as the longest (and most unread) post on Tween.